NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Tycho Brahe Mars oppositions
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2004 Nov 30, 21:01 +0000
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2004 Nov 30, 21:01 +0000
Omar Reis quoted a message he received, as follows- >P.S. Message from the amateur astronomy newsgroup: >~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >Pannekoek's table appears to employ the Julian calendar. The first >opposition listed, for the year 1580, was the only one that occurred >before the Gregorian reform was implemented in Catholic countries. > >The times shown are for a time zone 10 hours *ahead* of UT (GMT). >Subtracting 10 hours from each entry (being sure to roll back the >date by one if the result is less than zero) will give you the UT >Julian calendar dates/times. > >Incidentally, Jean Meeus lists every Mars opposition for the years >0 - 3000 in his book _Astronomical Tables of the Sun, Moon, and Planets_ >(second edition), 1995, pp. 62 - 96. > >Mark Gingrich - San Leandro, California >~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The "time-zone" references of this message surprise me somewhat. Time zones were NOT in use in that period. Instead, observations will presumably have been related to the apparent local time of the observer. There's no need for a time-difference from UT to be a whole number of hours. From the longitudes of Tycho's observatories at Hveen and near Prague, I would expect times there to be roughly 45-50 minutes ahead of time at Greenwich. Then, presumably, you have to account for the use of the Astronomical Day, which at Greenwich was 12 hours later than Greenwich Civil Time (effectively modern UT). Can anyone explain the reference in that message to "a time zone 10 hours ahead of UT"? What's it based on? I suggest that Omar takes it with some caution. I am rather surprised that problems with the value of delta-T are worrying Omar. Sure, Omar can calculate the moment of opposition with great accuracy. But could Tycho observe it to any great accuracy? It would involve measuring RA's and decs, of Mars, on successive nights, and of the Sun in the days, and then converting to ecliptic coordinates and interpolating. I doubt if he could measure to much better than 1 arc-minute or so. Anyone know different? If Omar is trying to check the precision of his predictions for early dates, I wonder if the timing of oppositions is the best way to go about it, because these are not sudden events identifiable to an exact time. Are eclipse timings available from that era, for testing? Of course, at that date, before pendulums, clocks were untrustworthy, which bedevils almost everything. George. ================================================================ contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at 01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. ================================================================