Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: True Distance vs. Observed Distance
    From: Greg Rudzinski
    Date: 2012 Sep 17, 12:44 -0700

    Brad,

    The way I understand the refraction correction as determined by table 15-2 is that the correction value is always positive and added to the observed sextant distance. If body A is at the zenith and body B is at some other elevation then the correction would be the positive value of the Nautical Almanac refraction table value for the elevation of body B. If body A and B are both on the same side of the zenith then the refraction correction value would be the difference of the two refraction values as positive values. For example if body A is at 45* elevation and body B is on the horizon then 34' - 1' = +33'( refraction value to add to the observed sextant distance to get true distance). When azimuths are between 0 and 180 degrees then the formula or table needs to be used. The special case of 0 and 180 azimuth is good for visualizing how refraction affects the distance.

    Greg Rudzinski

    [NavList] Re: True Distance vs. Observed Distance
    From: Brad Morris
    Date: 17 Sep 2012 14:54
    Well, that certainly clears up my confusion when the objects are 180 degrees in azimuth.

    Is this true for all azimuthal arrangements? For example, when 90 degrees apart in azimuth? Now when 0 degrees in azimuth?

    Do the corner cosines ever produce a negative result? That is, when I add the corner cosine result to the observed (or subtracted from the GC distance) is the corner cosine addition result in a subtraction due to the sign of the number?

    All of these questions are a function of getting it wrong the first time around. Dang! Now I get to do it all over again.

    Brad Morris


    On Sep 17, 2012 12:48 PM, "Greg Rudzinski" <gregrudzinski---com> wrote:
    Linked is a diagram showing how refraction changes observed distance between celestial bodies. For the diagram the bodies have a distance about 45* with the zenith directly above the observer. The refraction correction is added to the observed distance to get a true distance. If starting with a true distance from a GC calculator then the refraction correction is subtracted from the true distance to get the observed distance.

    Greg Rudzinski

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    File:


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site