# NavList:

## A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
 Add Images & Files Posting Code: Name: Email:
Re: Transcription of Worsley's Log
Date: 2009 Mar 20, 15:26 -0400

Hi Henry

Thank you very much for your independent confirmation of George’s original assessment of the issue.   The methodology is now un-disputed!   There are some very minor discrepancies in values which attract my attention.

When Worsley writes down his polar distance, he gets 102 degrees 51 ½ minutes.  We can subtract the 90 degrees for the South Pole, leaving a North Declination of 12 degrees 51 ½ minutes.    This is marginally different from the value you used to determine his GAT in part one of your equations of 12 degrees 51 minutes 17 seconds (for a difference of 13 seconds).  I wonder why Worsley would have disregarded the more accurate answer you have provided?

In part two of your explanation, we have exact agreement across the board.  We all get precisely the same logarithmic values.  The sum of the four logarithmic values is also the same.  However, when Worsley looks up (and I calculate) the arc-Haversine of 9.14437, we both get time values of 21-4-36, while you obtain 9-4-35.4.   This is due to rounding on my part, if the resolution is extended I obtain 35.51.  I think this just noise at the truncation point of the logarithmic values (5 places, 6 places, etc).   My question is more basic.  Worsley writes down 21-4-36, rounding off to a whole second.  Would that be prudent for the purposes of determination of chronometer error in his day?  Didn’t the arc-Haversine tables show only  the nearest second?

George and I now concur that Worsley must have taken his observation from Point Wild, which on modern charts is South 61 degrees 5 minutes 22 seconds West 54 degrees 53 minutes 45 seconds.  Worsley used the location of Cape Belsham.  I think he did this because it is so very close by  to Point Wild and because Cape Belsham is listed in some tables as the northernmost point of Elephant Island.    Of course, his tables or charts may have suffered from the difficulty of ascertaining lat lon, in his day, in the polar regions.

Best Regards

From: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] On Behalf Of hch
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:28 PM
To: NavList@fer3.com
Subject: [Possible SPAM] [NavList 7705] Re: Transcription of Worsley's Log
Importance: Low

"Confidentiality and Privilege Notice
The information transmitted by this electronic mail (and any attachments) is being sent by or on behalf of Tactronics; it is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee named above and may constitute information that is privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to same, you are not authorized to retain, read, copy or disseminate this electronic mail (or any attachments) or any part thereof. If you have received this electronic mail (and any attachments) in error, please call us immediately and send written confirmation that same has been deleted from your system. Thank you."

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Browse Files

Drop Files

### Join NavList

 Name: (please, no nicknames or handles) Email:
 Do you want to receive all group messages by email? Yes No
You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

### Posting Code

Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
 Email:

### Email Settings

 Posting Code:

### Custom Index

 Subject: Author: Start date: (yyyymm dd) End date: (yyyymm dd)