NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Transcription of Worsley's Log
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2009 Mar 25, 16:54 -0000
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2009 Mar 25, 16:54 -0000
Brad Morris wrote, about Worsley's determination of chronometer error at Elephant Island- "Secondly, neither George nor myself can establish with absolute certainty where he took his observation. Point Wild is an assumption. It makes logical sense, as, from their own accounts, it was very difficult to move over land in the Antarctic. Point Wild was the location of the camp. Most likely the observation was there but agreed, we can't prove it." On the contrary, there's little doubt about it, for these reasons- 1.. All around are high cliffs. Wild Camp was the only spot around where there was any sort of beach. To determine the dip involved in a Sun altitude, it has to be taken from a height above sea level that's accurately known. Observations from other points, such as Cape Belsham, would not have been possible, for that reason alone. 2. Elephant Island is far more rugged an environment than most of us have ever had the misfortune to get into. To visit the next headland, the precipitous Cape Belsham, that morning, before departing around noon, would call for crossing a crevassed glacier nearly a mile wide, then a couple of miles of mountain ridge which, if wasn't snow-covered, that was only because it was all too steep for snow to cling to. And then back. To what purpose? 3. They had their hands full in preparing and loading the Caird, that morning,and would not have been looking for any such diversions. They had a beach at hand which faced the morning Sun. I don't see that there's any question about the matter. ================== Finally, I suggest that we may be getting a bit preoccupied with this Elephant-Island chronometer-setting question, which plays only a minor part in the overall navigation, though an interesting part nevertheless. We're discussing what appears to be an error in time in his checking of the chronometer, the result of imperfect knowledge of the local geography. Each minute of time error translates to an error in longitude, throughout the rest of the journey, of 15 minutes of arc, or about 7 to 8 miles, depending on latitude. After the end of the journey, Worsley assessed that his chronometer had been slower that he thought, enough to set him back about 20 miles on his expected position. Position errors at setout may be enough to explain a significant part of this discrepancy, it appears. George. contact George Huxtable, at george@hux.me.uk or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222) or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---