Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Traditional navigation by slide rule
    From: Francis Upchurch
    Date: 2016 Jan 21, 07:02 -0000

    Thanks Brad,

    That is not pedantic, that is very sensible!

    Actually ,yes I know enough about slide rules to be well aware of that, but you are right to make sure, given my generally backward knowledge of maths which  hampers my progress in celnav somewhat ! (I’m slowly getting better at spherical trig and logs though, thanks to all you Navlist numerati)

    Am I correct in thinking that the only common scale on a slide rule which spaced out evenly and not logarithmically ,is indeed the log scale!

    Please check attached Fuller 2 sin scale (cos scale, same but numbers go in reverse )and confirm for this maths simpleton, that this is what you meant! (Scale and copyright Wayne Harrison. Unfortunately, I seem to have lost contact with him and not sure if he is still active. He provided all my scales for the authentic Byrave and Fuller models.

    Thanks again, and keep assuming the worst when it comes to my maths!

    Francis

     

     

    From: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] On Behalf Of Brad Morris
    Sent: 20 January 2016 21:02
    To: francisupchurch---.com
    Subject: [NavList] Re: Traditional navigation by slide rule

     

    Hi Francis

    I don't mean to be pedantic or otherwise review what you already know.  But here goes anyway!

    The scales must be logarithmic for the multiplication to work.  Just having some sine or cosine scale will not work unless it is also logarithmic. 

    But you already knew that ;-)

    Brad


    On Jan 20, 2016 3:16 PM, "Francis Upchurch" <NoReply_Upchurch@fer3.com> wrote:

    Thanks Brad,

    Yes, I thought you meant that. Good ah ha idea. Like all these, obvious to mere mortals like me once you show us the light! (now why didn’t I think of that? Thought the same years ago about monoclonal antibodies. I did actually think of that, but that sneaky Nobel Laureate got there first!).0

     I’ll test run a transparency cos scale over the top of the current cos and sine scale on my big Fuller 2 and see how it goes. The current layout allows multiplication and division of sines and cosines. But indirectly via the A (or is it C or D) regular scale, which involves several extra moves. More asap.

    Francis

    View and reply to this message

    View and reply to this message

    File:

      
       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site