Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Timing Noon
    From: Peter Fogg
    Date: 2002 Apr 9, 11:24 +1000

    Good stuff, George. Fascinating and informative, the sort of occasional
    gem I hope for and greatly appreciate receiving from the Nav list. I
    follow your drift and take your points. However ...
    
    The almanac contained within the electronic nav calculator I use gives
    me a precise moment for meridian passage of the Sun, according to the
    Lat/Long and date entered.
    
    For example, tomorrow Wednesday the 10 April, 2002
    (I was only briefly tempted to calculate for the 1 Avril but its too
    late for that confusion) at my position
    S33�44' E151�04, LAN occurs at 11h57m10s, the Zone Time is 10 hours
    ahead of GMT.
    
    At Abingdon, UK (easy commuting distance to Oxford, I note)
    N51�41' W1�17', LAN occurs at 12h06m27s
    
    and at a point at the entrance to Chesapeake Bay, USA,
    N37� W76�, LAN occurs at 12h05m16s, Zone Time is 5 hours behind GMT.
    
    I would be happy for anybody to check this data, any way you can, often
    wonder about just how accurate it is.
    
    If correct, its a great asset, since it also gives me my precise GHA,
    and thus Longitude, at the moment of meridian passage, as confirmed by
    my (corrected for error) ship's clock. Which, mated with the horizontal
    LOP given by the Sun's altitude, gives me a precise and reasonably
    accurate (compared to a running fix) position in the middle of the day,
    by means of one easy observation - although in practice I would always
    make as many sights as possible over a few minutes and average them out.
    Here the slowness of meridian passage becomes an advantage.
    
    And on the subject of accuracy, the traditional problem of knowing the
    Latitude well enough but being rather vague about where Longitude might
    lie is reversed - Longitude is spot-on but Latitude is subject to my
    human errors of observation and calculation.
    
    Trying to think this through a little further, by using an accurate
    annalemma  (I have one crude annalemma, and another method using graphs
    - they are, at best, accurate to the nearest minute) could I then reset
    my clock, if need be, to GMT?
    
    Would the result be at least as accurate as the result from successful
    lunar sights? And greatly simpler?
    
    Peter Fogg
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site