# NavList:

## A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
 Add Images & Files Posting Code: Name: Email:
Re: Timing Lunars with a Rock
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Jul 19, 18:11 EDT

```Alex Eremenko wrote:
"There is one more  problem with such crude pendulum which has not been
And the  effect is more substantial than some other effects mentioned so far:
The  period of a pendulum DOES depend on the amplitude. You can neglect this
dependence only if your pendulum is very long and the amplitude is very
small."

I don't think this is a big deal.

Theory first:
Calling the length of the pendulum L and any variation/error of estimation
of that length dL and calling the mean gravitational acceleration g and
variation of that with latitude dg and finally calling the amplitude of the  swing A
(the actual distance from the bottom of the arc), the percentage change  in
the period dT is given (to lowest non-vanishing order) by
dT =  (1/2)*dL/L - (1/2)*dg/g + (1/16)*(A/L)^2.
Assuming my ideal pendulum length  is 99.3 cm, an error of 1 cm will lead to
an error in the rate of 0.5% or in  other words 3 seconds in 10 minutes. This
is the most likely source of error in  a crude pendulum. The error from an
incorrect calibration for latitude (leading  to a non-zero dg) could be as much
as 0.25% if the pendulum were calibrated at  the pole and subsequently used at
the equator but in practice it will be an  order of magnitude smaller. And
what about the swing amplitude? The pendulum  should be calibrated for very small
swings which implies that A is nearly zero.  Suppose this has been done, and
we mistakenly allow (and maintain, which is even  harder) a swing amplitude of
20cm (that's a lot --40cm from one side to the  other-- and anyone who has
seen a pendulum clock in action would be unlikely to  use such a large swing but
I'm using it for the sake of argument). This will  lead to an increase in the
pendulum's period of 0.25%. So swing amplitude is not  a big issue until you
get to really large amplitudes, and these are relatively  unsustainable.

And a little experiment:
I made myself a pendulum with  a couple of washers and thread last night
measuring the length with a simple  tape measure. I found that my pendulum was
about 1.5 (+/-0.3) seconds fast after  five minutes. This is just about what I
would expect based on the numbers above.  It's very difficult to estimate the
length of a crude pendulum like this to  better than the nearest centimeter. I
tried to experiment with larger swing  amplitudes, but they're difficult to
maintain. My conclusion, based on  theoretical considerations and experiment, is
that an improvised pendulum,  without any other time standard for comparison,
can probably be considered  accurate to about +/-0.5% or +/-3 seconds in ten
minutes. Of course, it's much  better than this if we have some means to
compare this pendulum against a proper  time standard. Then the exact length doesn't
matter so much since we can rate  the pendulum like any other timekeeper.

-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N  72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars

```
Browse Files

Drop Files

### Join NavList

 Name: (please, no nicknames or handles) Email:
 Do you want to receive all group messages by email? Yes No
You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

### Posting Code

Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
 Email:

### Email Settings

 Posting Code:

### Custom Index

 Subject: Author: Start date: (yyyymm dd) End date: (yyyymm dd)