NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Timing Lunars with a Rock
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Jul 19, 17:55 EDT
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Jul 19, 17:55 EDT
Bruce Stark wrote: "The old navigation manuals suggested checking the log line and half minute glass occasionally. One way to check the glass was by pendulum. As I recall, the length of the pendulum, to the center of the musket ball that formed the weight, was sometimes given as 39 and 1/4 inches, and sometimes as 39 and 1/8 [small typo corrected]. Count a second each time the pendulum passed the bottom. I suppose you had to give the pendulum a few moments to settle the length of its swing. " For what it's worth, the difference in length suggested (an eighth of an inch) is comparable to the difference that arises from the variation of g with latitude. Personally, I don't think the length of a crude pendulum can be measured to better than an eighth of an inch in any meaningful way. One problem is that the length refers to the center of mass of the whole pendulum. If the plummet is a sphere (like the musket ball you mentioned) that helps a lot. Another problem is that the length of the string will change. For a two second pendulum period, I get a length of 99.6cm at the poles and 99.1 at th equator (cos(2*lat) variation in between). -FER 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars