Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Timekeeping in the post-WWV/post-HF world
    From: Tony Oz
    Date: 2018 Sep 28, 06:30 -0700

    Dear Peter,

    You said:

    ...given this fairly optimistic CN model, we need less than one second probable clock error over 30 days. Can a quartz wristwatch get there? Barely. The best ones can. Because of aging, the watch must have some recent rate characterization; if you wait more than a year or so, aging will cause its rate to drift too far, by an unknown and poorly predictable amount...

    Does this mean if I buy a quartz watch on a flee market (which I always do) - it has already aged-in to a more horizontal/predictable curve? I'm watching the going of a Timex I recently bought there - after I changed the cell there it settled-in and now it barely gains more than a second a week. The age of the watch must be several years by now.

    UT1 is predictable to ~10 ms accuracy 30 days in the future, so that's not a problem at all. Maybe it was slightly pedantic to mention it.

    By the way, the RWM right now transmits the dUT1 value of +0.06sec.

    Warm regards,


    60°N 30°E

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site