Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Time of meridian passage accuracy, Smart, and Cotter.
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2009 Sep 29, 11:37 +0100

    Douglas Denny misrepresents my words, in writing "You are too quick to
    deride Smart's formula" My words, in [9966] were-.
    
    "So my warning stands. Do not take the values from Smart equation 32, if you
    want precise answers for Equation of Time. Instead, go to Meeus, where you
    will find all the details to get it exactly right."
    
     No "derision" there, A simple statement of fact.
    
    He continued- "Meeus in fact suggests using it - and gives it as an
    alternative to his first formula."
    
    Yes-exactly as I had pointed out to him, when I wrote-
    "That equation has also been reproduced in Meeus, as eq. 28.3. Meeus quotes
    Smart's 1956 edition, presumably the copy that was on his shelf. I expect
    it's also in the same form in Douglas Denny's 1977 edition of Smart, as it
    applies always. Meeus gives a way to calculate precisely the "constants" in
    that equation, as they are not actually constant, but vary slowly with
    time."
    
    Douglas continued- "Smart's equation can incorporate the modern constants
    easily enough, and does so for the most important parameter (Mean longitude)
    used in Smart's anyway."
    
    Well, Sun's mean longitude is nothing more than a measure of time. It's the
    other changing parameters that are important, as I have listed: obliquity,
    eccentricity, longitude of perihelion. Smart doesn't tell you how to
    recalculate the current values of those, but Meeus does.
    
    It turned out, from Douglas' own words in [9963], where he wrote- "The mean
    longitude of the Sun I used in Smart's formula was calculated with up to
    date parameters for obliquity and nutation included.", that he had not
    himself taken Smart's equations at face value, just in accordance with my
    warning.  Instead, he took equation 29, which is true always, and updated
    certain parameters to the present day, just as I stated was necessary to get
    precise answers. Indeed, the accuracy of Smart's equations (from either
    edition) can't be maintained to the present-day, without such updating.
    Where were Douglas' new values taken from, then? Douglas mentioned only
    obliquity and nutation, but in addition changes occur in eccentricity of the
    Earth's orbit, and particularly in the longitude of perihelion, the
    parameter to which EoT is most sensitive. All need to be allowed for, to
    preserve precision long-term.
    
    Now for a bit of real pedantry-
    
    Although I wrote above that Smart's equation 29 is true always (when the
    current parameters are plugged in), that is only approximately the case.
    Perturbations, from the other planets and from the Moon, can shift the Sun's
    GHA by (rarely) up to 0.2 arc-minutes. Such effects were ignored by Smart,
    so his approach can hardly be described as "rigorous".  That explains why
    calculating by his formula is so much simpler than Meeus' full-works, which
    include many, many terms from Bretagnon. However, I suggest those
    perturbations are small enough to allow we-mariners to discard them. And
    then, Smart's predictions did not include the effects of nutation, which can
    displace the Sun's GHA by up to about 0.3 arc-minutes.. Mariners often
    ignore nutation; fair enough if they're aware of that approximation. I.too,
    have ignored both effects in this discussion, because being cyclic
    phenomena, they don't accumulate up. Unlike the secular changes that were
    the object of my postings, which accumulate indefinitely.
    
    George.
    
    contact George Huxtable, at  george@hux.me.uk
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
    Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site