# NavList:

## A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
 Add Images & Files Posting Code: Name: Email:
Re: Time of meridian passage accuracy
From: Douglas Denny
Date: 2009 Sep 25, 11:26 -0700

```The Equation of Time is quite rigorously dealt with in W.M. Smart's book
'Textbook on Spherical Astronomy'.

A formula is quoted based on the mean longitude of the Sun.
Being dependent on parameters of the Apparent Sun, because of Delta T it
cannot be predicted in advance if great accuracy is required.
---------

For navigational use for meridional passage of the Sun a time to within one
minute is quite satisfactory as the rate of change in altitude is small at
maximum altitude for a good few minutes either side of Mer Passage.

To give some idea of this: herewith is a scan of a meridian passage of the Sun
plotted as a graph from results found using my MkIXBM bubble sextant on Wed
29th April this year.  I was playing around after calibrating the sextant
(with a laser level down the garden and a target on a tree at about 20 Metres
away), and used Mer Passage of the Sun as a method of checking accuracy (as
it happened to be a nice sunny day).

There a few points worth noting:

1) the rate of change of altitude is very small near Mer Passage.
Change of altitude at Mer Passage within approx one minute of arc in altitude
was approx from 11-46 to 12-07 in time i.e 21 minutes.

2) Using a graph with best fit curve gives much more accurate results as the
hyperbolic form of the curve can be deduced by eye, and using French curves,
can be done more accurately than just averaging the results.

3) The variation of the personal observations of the observer and sextant
both, can be deduced aproximately from the graph.  Using a graph with best
fit curve the personal errors are largely eliminated leaving the sextant
error mainly apparent.

You will note the variation around Mer Passage in the example (where there is
very little change in altitude going on so the variations are largely
personal errors plus sextant errors such as backlash in the gearing to the
mirror) is about one minute of arc (i.e. plus or minus half a minute of arc)
- which is exactly what I would have expected, as my sextant has backlash in
the gear from altitude knob to mirror of around half a minute of arc in the

4) a measure of accuracy can be fairly confidently made to around one minute
of arc or better (depending on the backlash in the gearing) with care and
lots of readings around Mer Passage.  I did this particular exercse for the
fun of it on my own; but if a serious attempt is made for accuracy, another
person present to take down the readings and measure time accurately as the
observer concentrates on his business with the sextant would give much better
results.

5) Within the limits of the rather slapdash observations, one can see the Mer
Passage timing is exactly as predicted for the longitude of my position
(obtained by GPS).

6)One can use the shadow of the Sun at exact Mer Passage time to establish an
exact North/South line in your garden if you so wish.

If you do this accurately calculating the Mer Passage, using an accurate
longitude, and using a theodolite,  you can establish N/S very accurately
indeed.  It one of the methods used by surveyors.
(Stars/planets can be used as well of course).

7)By caclulating Latitude from the observed altitude at Mer Passage for the
day/time by using declination (a very simple standard calculation - see
graph) and comparing teh Latitude by observation with the known Latitude of
my location (obtained by GPS)one can find directly the index error of the
sextant to within the limits of the observation method (i.e. within about one
minute of arc).
In this case the error was about 1.5 minute of arc. And so it proves in use.
The line of position found by that sextant is usually very near plus or minus
couple of minutes of arc under good conditions of observing, ...which is
about what I normally expect as best possible for a bubble sextant.

Douglas Denny.
Chichester.  England.

File:

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
```
Browse Files

Drop Files

### Join NavList

 Name: (please, no nicknames or handles) Email:
 Do you want to receive all group messages by email? Yes No
You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

### Posting Code

Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
 Email:

### Email Settings

 Posting Code:

### Custom Index

 Subject: Author: Start date: (yyyymm dd) End date: (yyyymm dd)