NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Thomas Jefferson and Lunar Obs.
From: Ken Muldrew
Date: 2005 Apr 4, 14:51 -0600
From: Ken Muldrew
Date: 2005 Apr 4, 14:51 -0600
On 3 Apr 2005 at 18:26, George Huxtable wrote: > Did Greenwich provide that sort of service, I wonder, for their observed > lunar transits, in the period we were discussing (around the time of the > Lewis and Clark return in 1806) ? > > I don't recall seeing any accounts of travellers being assisted by the > observatory after their return, to correct lunar-based or Jupiter-based > longitudes for errors in prediction. That's not to say it didn't happen, > and I would welcome any references to it, if it did. David Thompson used the locations that he calculated in the field for his map of Western Canada and from re-working some of his calculations I can attest that he took the values published in the Nautical Almanac (many of which were in error by up to 30" for lunar distances). If Greenwich had published corrections then Thompson would have been ideally placed to know about them and use them. His teacher, Philip Turnor, became one of Maskelyne's computers when he returned to England. Since Turnor would have been aware of the innacuracies in the almanac, and the impact on Thompson's mapping, it seems likely he would have informed Thompson of any sort of erratum that might have been used retrospectively to correct his longitudes. If anyone knows of an example of an explorer retrospectively correcting their longitudes, I too would like to hear about it. Ken Muldrew.