Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Thomas Jefferson and Lunar Obs.
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2005 Apr 2, 01:59 EST
    George H wrote:
    "The same question arises, for the Almanacs around 1803. How precisely was the Moon's Right Ascension tabulated, and at what time intervals?"
    You can check online at the G.W.Blunt-White library on the Mystic Seaport web site. Or... there is a description of the accuracy levels of the early tables in Sadler's "Man Is Not Lost", which, if I remember correctly, you own.
    But it doesn't matter. The almanac is not required for clearing any lunar observations for longitude UNLESS you need the longitudes en route (as aboard a ship at sea heading for a destination with a known latitude and longitude). We've discussed this recently. For exploration and mapping where the longitudes en route are not critically necessary, what you need most of all are good observatory observations (e.g. at Greenwich) covering the period of the observations made in the field. This was the fundamental issue that seems to have escaped those early American seekers of longitude.
    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site