# NavList:

## A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
 Add Images & Files Posting Code: Name: Email:
Re: Table 4 Pub 249 / 19th Century Navigation
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2016 May 18, 15:17 -0700

Stan, you wrote:
"In our 19th Century class, you teach adding 12' to the sextant altitude (corrected for index error) to account for semidiameter, dip, and refraction. In this example, it appears that 12' is added to account for semidiameter, parallax, and dip, and a separate 4' is subtracted to account for refraction. Please explain. "

Navigation is cultural. Methods are employed because they are learned and passed on, with occasional corrective from respected authorities and textbook authors like Bowditch. Practice in the 19th century was not monolithic, of course. The advice in Bowditch here is slightly more detailed than the common "add 12 for LL, subtract 20 for UL". Bowditch was only one among many navigation resources available, and as a textbook it is only a clue to practice, not a reflection. In real history, you never find laws. There are always exceptions to every rule you can write down about historical navigators' behavior, and there are always variations from one culture of navigation to another. Any navigator worth his salt understood that there were really various separate corrections. But in practice, the advantage of consistent calculation methods seems to have been more important. That's just speculation on my part. The only thing we can say honestly is that "navigation is cultural". Patterns come and go, and only the primary source evidence --logbooks, navigation notebooks, marginal notes, scrap paper-- can really help us see those patterns with any certainty.

By the way, I don't know if you were there when I said this in the portion of the class you attended, but Lecky himself in his 'Wrinkles' mocked navigators who were so lazy that they didn't calculate dip, refraction, and other corrections separately (meaning navigators who were still using the 12/20 trick). The first edition of 'Wrinkles' was published in 1883 if I remember correctly, which suggests that this was still a practical issue, perhaps waning, for British navigators at this late date. But I haven't studied any logbooks or other primary sources for British navigation on that, so, as I say, it's just suggestive. Certainly as late as the 1890s on American vessels, the 12/20 altitude correction was still common. It's interesting that some navigators used this easy correction for latitudes but were slightly more careful for longitude.

Frank Reed

Browse Files

Drop Files

### Join NavList

 Name: (please, no nicknames or handles) Email:
 Do you want to receive all group messages by email? Yes No
You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

### Posting Code

Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
 Email:

### Email Settings

 Posting Code:

### Custom Index

 Subject: Author: Start date: (yyyymm dd) End date: (yyyymm dd)