Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Systematic error and its resolution
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2007 Apr 6, 16:54 -0400

    
    Geoffrey,
    
    Ok, I understood.
    Actually this is not exactly what we call "index error"
    (at least for marine sextants)
    but "combined index+arc+bubble+prismaticity-of-filters+
    personal+
    whatever systematic error".
    
    Alex.
    
    On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Geoffrey Kolbe wrote:
    
    >
    >
    > Alex, the index error of a bubble sextant can be determined from an unknown
    > position.
    >
    > By taking sightings on bodies in opposition, the separation of the
    > resultant position lines will, on average, be twice the index error.
    >
    > In my posting #2531, I advocated taking four sightings, a North-South pair
    > and an East-West pair, on bodies at the Cardinal points. The North-South
    > pair effectively give you your latitude and the East-West pair your
    > longitude. The position lines from the four sightings should form a square
    > box if index error is the dominant error. If the box is not substantially
    > square, there is a non-systematic error somewhere which is of the same
    > order or greater than the index error.
    >
    > See http://www.pisces-press.com/desert/14thMarch.jpg for an example of what
    > I mean. In this example, the box is substantially square, giving us
    > confidence that the dominant error is indeed index error. The size of the
    > box is about 10' on a side, from which we deduce that the uncorrected index
    > error was 5'. The position lines are all 'away from' the body in question,
    > so the sextant altitudes are 5' too small. I need to add 5' to my altitudes
    > to correct the index error.
    >
    > A subsequent round of sights at a different location a few days later show
    > the results when this 5' is factored in. See
    > http://www.pisces-press.com/desert/19thMarch.jpg
    >
    > Geoffrey Kolbe
    >
    >
    > At 20:24 06/04/2007, you wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > >Geoffrey,
    > >
    > > > It is easy to determine the Index Error of a marine
    > > > sextant, but not of bubble sextants.
    > >
    > >Easy or not, but I infer from your message that you
    > >can find the IC of your bubble sextant SOMEHOW.
    > >
    > >I don't see any way to do this at all,
    > >except taking an altitude from a known position.
    > >
    > >This can be done once in a while, but certainly not
    > >before or after an observation, if the purpose of
    > >the observation is to find this position.
    > >
    > >Alex.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    > >
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site