NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Sunrise,Sunset,LAN,LMT
From: Doug Royer
Date: 2004 Aug 5, 18:48 -0700
From: Doug Royer
Date: 2004 Aug 5, 18:48 -0700
Henry, I bet most haven't.And you are correct.Just because something lacks "accuracy" or an idea which goes against the conventional wisdom of "armchair" navigation it should not just be discounted as pure bunkum. Celestial Nav. isn't all that hard to do once one learns the basic rules and practices it in real life situations.One can get as fancy or "into" the finer points of it but it will still be an approximation in real life situations. Take,for example,how it is taught today to mariners,in various maritime academies,who need it to upgrade or start a certain liscense. All the acadamies and marine schools who teach and/or certify mariners for CN must abide by the class outline approved of by the U.S.C.G.In these courses one doesn't have to have a grasp of any trig or higher math.The course outlines are based on completing the whole task by knowing no more than basic arithmatic(+,-,x,/)and being able to read and understand sight reduction volumes.More emphysis is placed on practical sight taking methods.Granted,some of the courses are basic,entry level stuff.But as an officer advances in tonnage and route the tests are more involved and not easy to pass.One has to understand all the material.To sit for and pass an exam on anything over 1600 GT domestic with and Oceans endorcement one not only draws on classroom lessons but practical, real life nav. lessons as well.One can have a great grasp on the higher math to accomplish the task but it is not neccesary.I've known professional navigators of both bends who had successful(no incidents)careers. That's all anyone really needs to navigate around the world.Practical experiance will teach more about navigating then years on the armchair.