Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Suitable Sextants - Mirrors
    From: Doug Royer
    Date: 2005 Oct 12, 18:20 -0700

    Joel Jacobs wrote:
    "Your analysis though  interesting, fails to take into account that a
    sextant's mirrors are not used in  a static state, and hence size does make
    a
    difference. Consider that the  platform is moving directionally, and rolling
    and
    pitching all at the same  time."
    
    Frank wrote:
    But since the mirrors, telescope, and other components of the  sextant are
    all experiencing the same motion, this really isn't relevant to  mirror
    size.
    They're either big enough to fill the field of view, or they're not  --no
    matter
    how much pitching and rolling there is.
    
    My reply:
    In my experience taking onboard cuts in all types of conditions with many
    different models of sextants I stand with what Joel states just from a
    practical use stand point. I've taken sights with old(WWII vintage)David
    White sextants that had the smaller mirrors than the sextants of today and
    it is more difficult to hold the body in the mirrors with the smaller
    mirrors. Granted those same sextants had the old type scopes on them also.
    It is sooooooo much easier to do the work with a modern sextant that has the
    larger mirrors and larger lens on the scopes.
    
    As for plastic sextants:
    I wouldn't use them for serious, everyday onboard work because of just the
    following 2 reasons.
    1. The optics are horrible. Period. Even on the top of the line Davis 25's
    the optics don't even compare with the optics on a used Astra. Even on an
    Astra's worst day there is no comparison.
    2. While running around taking care of duties etc one doesn't have time to
    sit and futz with a plastic sextant's idiosyncrasies and take multiple cuts
    for averaging while underway.
    One gets out on the wing, takes the cut (experience will let you know if the
    cut feels right), record the data, reduce for pos and go on about one's
    duties.
    Now, if all one has is a plastic sextant to use........ by all means use it.
    
    Heft:
    I like to use the heavier sextant. Just like I like to use a heavier rifle.
    The heavier sextant feels more stable, even in the roughest seas, than a
    light instrument does. One has to learn how to spend the time to set up a
    shot and then take that shot accurately and quickly. The important step here
    is the set up almost more so than the shot itself. After everything is set
    up for the shot and the cut/shot is taken within the time frame, known by
    the observer from experience, to be within his/her limits of physical
    comfort a metal sextant isn't heavy at all. It's like an extension of one's
    body even in a pitching, bucking little vessel.
    
    
    It's good to be back with you people after a few months working the shipping
    lanes of the Pacific and Indian Oceans.
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site