NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Suitable Sextants
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Oct 12, 19:58 EDT
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Oct 12, 19:58 EDT
Joel Jacobs wrote: "Take a proper Star scope and couple it with a small size horizon mirror, and note the results at twilight." I think this comment gets to the heart of the matter. In older sextants, telescopes rarely had large apertures. They went for small aperture and long focal length. The horizon mirror only needs to be as big as the aperture of the telescope. Navy sextants from the Second World War had small horizon mirrors because their telescopes were usually small in aperture. Naturally there is no reason to have a horizon mirror bigger than than the telescope aperture. And: "Also take a sextant with small mirrors and use what ever scope you are most comforatble with and try some high altitude sun sights. Note the results." And that brings us to the index mirror. This doesn't need to be any wider than the horizon mirror, but it helps a lot if it's longer (bigger in the dimension along the index arm) because it will be foreshortened when the sextant is set to a large angle. You can see this by setting the sextant to 120 degrees and then looking through the horizon glass at the index mirror. -FER 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars