Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Still on LOPs
    From: Peter Fogg
    Date: 2002 Apr 30, 03:22 +1000

    What I currently find intriguing is the enlarged hat which retains the same
    proportions as the original. I suspect that it does not need to be enlarged greatly
    to increase enormously the likelihood of its containing the actual position, as
    soon as we accept the notion that the further we move from the LOPs the less the
    chance of encountering the actual position.
    The next step which is, inevitably, finding the fix position in exactly the same
    place as it was in the smaller hat of the same proportions, doesn't just beg but
    fairly shrieks the question, now thrice repeated: is this not all an exercise in
    futility?  25%, 14.whatever%, what difference does it make if the fix position, the
    only point we can calculate and use, is exactly the same?
    George Huxtable wrote:
    > I suspect he is gradually coming round to the majority way of thinking
    > about the cocked-hat, but desperately trying to avoid admitting it, even to
    > himself. He is doing this by redefining the quantities involved. We can't
    > allow him to get away with it.
    I would like to think that I retain an open mind on the question. Whether it is the
    'majority way' or not is irrelevant, of course, this doesn't affect whether it is
    right or wrong.  As for 'redefining', another term might be lateral thinking.
    Still suspect that the base for the 25% idea has a slim and tottery foundation: the
    50% chance of a RANDOM point falling on either side of a RANDOM line, which becomes
    25% when two lines intersect.
    As somebody else pointed out, they are not random at all, each LOP is an
    approximation of the actual position, this is why they come together in a
    (hopefully) small hat. This is what I meant with my woefully unscientific
    expression of the opposing LOPs 'pulling' the probability of the AP toward
    'I took that to imply that he thought (then) that it was impossible for the
    "real position" to be outside the cocked hat. Does he think that now?'
    Never said so, thought so even less. See 'open mind' above.
    'But this is in the world of Alice through the Looking Glass'
    Lewis Caroll, interestingly enough, was a mathematician (and a few other quirky
    things). No doubt his fertile imagination was useful to him in the pursuit of all
    his interests.
    Let's look at this (yet!) another way. Visually. Draw (with your mind's eye if you
    are lazy) a hat with generous proportions within and without on an A4 sheet (as I
    have been). Now according to the 25% theory put 25 points at random within the hat.
    What are we to do with the 75 we have left to distribute? I suppose we have to
    place them at the same random distances outside the hat. Some of them, since there
    are so many compared to inside the hat, are going to land an awfully long way from
    the hat itself. Nevertheless each is presumably as valid as any other. But no other
    distribution, either, seems to make much sense. According to the 'LOP approximation
    of AP' fact, and also the 'careful navigator' assumption which accompanied the
    beginning of this discussion, since we still have only 25 for inside the hat the
    remaining 75 will have to be thickly clustered all along, and close to, the outside
    of the LOPs, since the further away from the LOPs we go the fewer points are to be
    found. This picture is truly absurd, it looks as though the 75 outside are beating
    at the walls, trying to get inside!
    'We can't allow him to get away with it.'
    The 25% theory is starting to sound like dogma, something that MUST be accepted.
    We seem dangerously close to the 25% theory becoming a sacred cow itself.
    Where is the butcher when we need him?

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site