Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Still on LOP's
    From: Rodney Myrvaagnes
    Date: 2002 Apr 22, 13:11 -0500

    You have not allowed subsequent measurements to move the probability
    one way or the other. That is the asumption I referred to. When you
    integrate the product of three (or more ) probability densities for a
    local region, the shoulders of the distribution become steeper and
    narrower than each of the individual distributions. To get the same
    probability in a cell away from the center you have to be assuming a
    flat density out to the edges.
    On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:31:45 +0100, Dr. Geoffrey Kolbe wrote:
    >Rodney, I have made no assumptions regarding the actual error distribution.
    >For the purposes of my arguments it can be anything you like.
    >What I _have_ assumed is that the error in measuring the bearing on a
    >particular landmark is equally likely to be to one side of the landmark as
    >to the other. Do you have a problem with this?
    Rodney Myrvaagnes                                  J36 Gjo/a
    "Curse thee, thou quadrant. No longer will I guide my earthly way by thee."  Capt. Ahab

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site