NavList:

   

Reply

On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:50:28 +0100, George Huxtable wrote:

>I sent the following message, in error, to Rodney Myrvaagnes directly,
>rather than to the list. So here it is copied again to all. Rodney has
>replied directly to me, and I hope he will now copy the relevant parts of
>his reply to the list.
>
>=


This is exactly one point I was making. They cannot be compared.

As I have shown in other posts, you can't show that positions will lie
outside a cocked hat without saying something about what distribution
you are talking about. I apologize for saying you chose the rectangular
dist.

On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:18:26 +0100, George Huxtable wrote:

>His references to Newton and Liebnitz are quite bogus. In one case we are
>considering the probability of a point lying within a defined area. In the
>other, the probability of a point lying on a line. The first is infinitely
>greater than the second.
>
Rodney Myrvaagnes                                                        J36 Gjo/a


"Nuke the gay whales for Jesus" -- anon T-shirt

   

Reply