Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Still on LOP's
    From: Rodney Myrvaagnes
    Date: 2002 Apr 20, 01:40 -0500

    On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:39:46 -0400, Noyce, Bill wrote:
    
    >I've also been thinking about George's assertion that the
    >cocked hat contains the tru position just 25% of the time,
    >and, much to my surprise, I've convinced myself it's true.
    >
    a counterexample that covers practically all plausible cases:
    
    Taking George's simplifying assumption of a rectangular probability 
    distribution, let's be sure we know what that means. Any
    probability distribution must sum to 1 over all possible cases. Or, the 
    integral from minus infinity to plus infinity of [P(x) dx] =1. Hence,
    the probability of the obsevation falling in any intervalof x within the 
    non=zero range is exactly the fraction of that range the interval
    takes up.
    
    With three lines of position, all independently measured by the same method, 
    we must assign the observations the same probability
    distribution.
    
    One possibility is that they are just wide enough to make all three 
    observations possible. That results in the traditronal center point of
    the triangle being the only non-zero probability.
    
    Another possibility is to make the rectangles just cover all the other 
    observations. If the cocked hat happens to be equilateral, the
    non-zero area expands to fill the triangle, and is zero everywhere outside. As 
    the triangle changes away from equilateral, a band of
    non-zero appears outside the two long sides, but the inside of the triangle 
    remains as strong. Eventually the two ouside triangles will
    equal and pass the area inside.
    
    To treat the result that way is to ignore the geometric reason the band got 
    wider--that two of the LOPs are nearly parallel, and the
    distance of their crossing from the third LOP does not detract from the third 
    LOP. A reasonable band to apply in this case would be
    the width that allowed the nearly-parallel LOPs to reach the two 
    closely-spaced corners on the third (crossing) LOP.
    
    
    
    
    
    Rodney Myrvaagnes                                  J36 Gjo/a
    
    
    "Curse thee, thou quadrant. No longer will I guide my earthly way by thee."  Capt. Ahab
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site