Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Statistical analysis of sight data to improve personal technique
    From: Lars Bergman
    Date: 2022 May 11, 06:59 -0700

    Jim Rives was puzzled about the bad result using a straight line regression a few days ago, then recalculated and came to the conclusion that "The regression line is far better than a simple average, which is what i would have expected and relieved to see is proved out."

    I do not agree with this conclusion, because "a simple average" will fall exactly on the regression line. The arithmetic means of the times and the distances should fit perfectly into the linear least squares regression formula, if based on the same input data and calculated correctly.

    A randomly choosen time and the correspondingly calculated distance could give a "better" or"worse" result than the average of times and distances if the calculated slope of the line does not correspond exactly to the actual slope of distance versus time. This is probably the explanation, and a short time span of the observations will increase the uncertainty in the slope determination.


    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site