NavList:

   

Reply

> From: 

> Do you remember when we were discussing that? I would like to point people to
> those earlier discussions for comparison.

I used printed lines calibrated for various distances instead of the
computer screen.  I searched the test patterns and and a spread sheet and
they were produced between December 14 and December 31 in 2005.  I suspect
your method was posted shortly before the above dates

> PS: do you ever get veja du? ...that strange feeling that none of this has
> ever happened before.  :-)

Of course not, or I would not go boldly where no simpleton has never gone
before believing I had been there already and everything was AOK ("alright"
for our foreign readers); especially as I have demonstrated time and time
again I have the attention span and recall of a crack baby. (For our foreign
readers, a "crack baby" is an infant born addicted to drugs [crack] as its
mother abused drugs during her pregnancy.) Your point is well taken however.
Your hallway method used a laser and its purpose was to determine IE/EC, not
micrometer drum eccentricity.

Bill B.






--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

   

Reply