NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Star to star angular measurement, beginner
From: Bill B
Date: 2005 Mar 14, 18:00 -0500
From: Bill B
Date: 2005 Mar 14, 18:00 -0500
Frank Thank you for the explanations and reference. > The reason the numbers didn't work out here is simply that you can't solve > spherical trig problems with plane trig equations. Over short distances (less > than a few degrees), you can get good results (since a small section of a > sphere is well-approximated by a plane) but not good enough for this sort of > problem. That was my suspicion as to why the separation numbers did not agree. > > By the way, I don't think you were around when I posted a little thing on > star-star sights last year. It's in the list archives "star-star sights" for > April 6, 2004. It was designed as a preamble for some later stuff on lunars > (see "Easy Lunars" April 28, 2004). I've checked out the postings and pasted them into word for further study. It is, however, a use of the word "easy" I am not familiar with ;-) Bill