Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Star - Star Observations
    From: Andrés Ruiz
    Date: 2010 Mar 12, 14:29 +0100

    Brad, I suppose you first calculate Hc = f( B, L, Dec, GHA )

    Refraction is a function of the apparent altitude: R = f(Ha)

    And Ha = Hc + R = Hc + f(Ha)

    The solution must be obtained with precision by an iterative process.

     

    I have repeated the calculations with more precise ephemerides, and the solution is the same.

    Note the variation of R with Ha:

     

    Ha º

    R

    30

    1.68

    31

    1.62

    32

    1.56

    33

    1.50

     

    Regards.

    ---

    Andrés Ruiz

    Navigational Algorithms

    https://sites.google.com/site/navigationalalgorithms/

     


    De: navlist-bounce@fer3.com [mailto:navlist-bounce@fer3.com] En nombre de Brad Morris
    Enviado el: jueves, 11 de marzo de 2010 21:24
    Para: NavList@fer3.com
    Asunto: [NavList] Re: Star - Star Observations

     

    Hi Andres

     

    Thank you very much for sticking with me on this!  I discovered that I had inverted one of the terms in Young’s equation. 

     

    For the calculated distance

    Morris              40d 21m 20.92s. 

    Ruiz                 40d 21m 17.96s, a trivial difference between us of 3 seconds.

     

    For the observed distance, I now get

                Corner Cosines            40d 22m 4.67s

                Young’s Equation        40d 22m 4.70s

    Now there is no difference between my two results and therefore can readily retract my question about which is better. 

    Corner Cosines and Young’s Equations yield the same result.

     

    Your result for the observed distance is

                Ruiz                             40d 21m 55.26s

    There is a small discrepancy between our results of about 8 seconds. 

     

    In tracing this down, I believe it to be the altitude correction and most likely the atmospheric conditions

                USNO                          1m 36s  Sirius altitude correction

                                                    1m 36s Alphard altitude correction

                Morris                          1m 35.47s Sirius

                                                    1m 35.79s Alphard

                Ruiz                             1m 33.43 Sirius

                                                    1m 33.74 Alphard

     

    Not only have I corrected this deficiency in the spreadsheet, I have re-cast the interface to accept GHA Aries, SHA Object 1, SHA Object 2, Declination Object 1 & Declination Object 2.  Of course, these items will now come from the Nautical Almanac, not my Skyscout. 

     

    Now on to the calibration of the arc of my sextant! 

     

    Best Regards

    Brad

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site