Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Smallest direct reading on sextant veriers
    From: Bill Morris
    Date: 2014 Dec 5, 11:41 -0800


    Most vernier octants seem to have been divided to read to 30 seconds and many sextants of the period as well, though 20 seconds for sextants was perhaps commoner. While some sextants of the period were divided to 10 seconds, I doubt that the vernier was consistently readable to this precision, and the observation was unlikely to have been accurate to this level. On 15 January, 1773, Captain Cook discusses a comparison of results of lunars using quadrants with and without telescopes, so we may perhaps conclude that up to this point telescopes were not regularly used, making an intrumental precision of 10 seconds moot. He wrote "We certainly can observe with greater accuracy with the Telescope when the ship is sufficiently steady which however very seldom happens so that most observations at sea are made without..." On this particular day his and Mr Wales's result for longitude agreed to within a handful of minutes with Kendall's chronometer, while the mean of six observers not using telescopes was more than a degree greater.

    Bill Morris


    New Zealand

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site