Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Slocum's lunars / Chauvenet
    From: Herbert Prinz
    Date: 2003 Dec 19, 01:24 -0500

    I wrote:
    > To my knowledge, [Chauvenet] is the only one to consider for a sea-method
    > the
    > oblateness of the earth, the effect of which can change the final result
    > for the distance by typically 6" or 0.1' of arc in mid-latitudes.
    Nonsense. Charles Borda had already given such a procedure, as well as a
    small auxiliary table of moon parallax corrections to be used with it, in
    his "Description et usage du cercle de reflection", 1787. (I even mentioned
    this briefly in a post to this list, a year ago.) His method was rigorous.
    Chauvenet may have been the only one to suggest it for an "approximative"
    Whether the accuracy of the ephemeris around 1800 actually warranted the
    extra effort that this step would cost the navigator, is another question.
    Borda certainly thought that the quality of his instrument justified it.
    Herbert Prinz

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site