Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Sides of the Navigational Triangle - Naming Conventions?
    From: David Iwancio
    Date: 2020 Dec 30, 17:25 -0800


    I probably haven't read as many texts on the subject as others here, but in triangle PZG where P is the elevated pole, Z the observer's zenith and G the star's geographic point, the conventions in navigational texts I've seen usually refer to the sides as being the complements ("co-X," e.g. "cosine") of values directly published or directly measured.  So I've generally seen side PZ named "co-latitude" (or "colatitude") and side ZG as "co-altitude" (I've never seen "coältitude" and thankfully have never seen "coaltitude").

    Texts on generalized astronomy tend to call side PZ "zenith distance," probably because land-based astronomers tend to measure angles off their local vertical rather than their horizontal.

    Side PG I've generally seen named "polar distance" rather than "co-declination," probably because the declination's complement depends on its name and the name of the elevated pole, and "polar distance" is less ambiguous.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site