Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Sextants with Polarizing filters
    From: Peter Fogg
    Date: 2006 Jan 26, 16:58 +1100

    Bill wrote, about an experiment to determine loss of light from use of one
    then two combined polarizing filters:
    
    > Nominally 1.5 stops loss per filter, 2 stops with filters combined and
    > aligned.
    
    Along the way to testing this for myself, one practical problem was
    immediately apparent when 3 polarizing filters were laid side by side on a
    lightbox (a sheet of well-lit white paper will do):
    
    3 filters from different manufacturers; 3 different densities
    
    (the colour varies too; they certainly can't all be neutral, although this
    is another issue).
    
    The other thing that was apparent was that the density of each, while
    obviously not identical, looked as though it was in the order of an f/ stop
    or two. Laying one half of a filter over another, aligned for maximum light
    transmission, lead to a darkening of the combination of about another f/
    stop, judged by eye.
    
    The next step was to measure the loss of light passed by one, then two of
    them together, using a light meter. While the precise results varied
    according to which two were combined (or not) the broad result, or the
    result rounded to the nearest f/stop were:
    one alone: about 2 f/ stops
    two aligned for max. transmission: about 3 f/ stops.
    
    Which is interesting. Similar, while not identical to Bill's results.
    What I think is that apart from the polarizing effect there is a muddying
    effect due to the (variable) densities of each filter. If there was such a
    thing as a polarizing filter without density these effects could perhaps be
    measured more accurately.
    
    Then Ken Muldrew wrote:
    'If you have 3 polarizers you can easily see how the picket fence analogy
    fails. Simply line up 2 filters with a space between them. Rotate one until
    you get maximum darkening (here the axes of polarization are at 90? to each
    other). Now insert the 3rd polarizer in between the other two. Suddenly
    light passes through all three! How could the middle polarizer change the
    orientation of the other two "picket fences"?'
    
    This is indeed true, and wondrously strange ..
    As Professor Julius Sumner Miller used to say:
    
    "Why is it so?"
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site