NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Sextant precision.
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2005 Jun 18, 09:53 +0100
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2005 Jun 18, 09:53 +0100
Discussion about the ultimate precision that a sextant can achieve provides regular fodder for this list. Not that I can claim much first-hand experience along those lines, as all I own is a plastic Ebbco, though I've used several other instruments. So discussion of discrepancies of a fraction of an arc-minute are not directly relevant to me. Recently, Alex has been discussing some small discrepancies in sextant readings, between star-to-star observations and others, at the fraction-of-a minute level. I wonder if this might perhaps be related to a senstivity of the sextant to tilt? It's a question I've asked before, some years ago, but since then the list membership has changed somewhat. I raised the matter, then, in terms of comparing the measured elevation of a distant fixed object, with the sextant its normal way up, and then measuring again with the sextant inverted. It's not just a question of whether the frame of the sextand distorts, ever so slightly, under its own weight, as it's tilted. I would suspect that at the sub-minute level, a sextant's readings are most sensitive to the tiniest flexure in the mounting arrangements of the two mirrors. If there's the tiniest droop in the angling of those mirrors, under their own weight, as the sextant is tilted in different directions, that will upset the precision. Their fixings have to be very rigid indeed, even though the mirrors are so light in weight. Alex, straining for maximum precision, has had the calibration of his sextant checked against a lab. instrument when mounted in a particular orientation. I ask, will it maintain that calibration, over its whole range, to sub-minute levels, as it is tilted about to measure a lunar or an inter-star angle? Is tilt-sensitivity a possible source of error? What do others think? Have any such checks on sextants been reported? =========================== On a different tack, the question arises of any error from refraction by the sextant's shades. Frank has explained how to check and allow for this. However, one such shade on my sextant quite defeats any such attempts. It's the very darkest shade, a very deep-blue one in my case, that's required for viewing the sun. When I look through that shade, it's so dark that the only object I can see is the sun. Without that shade, I can't safely look at the sun at all. So how do I compare two measured angles, observed with and without that shade? What do I look at, to do that job? Others must have met that same problem. Suggestions, please. George. =============================================================== Contact George at george@huxtable.u-net.com ,or by phone +44 1865 820222, or from within UK 01865 820222. Or by post- George Huxtable, 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.