Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Sextant optics
    From: Jim Thompson
    Date: 2004 May 2, 08:02 -0300

    The thread on the AstraIIIb's split mirror was very helpful, but did not
    thoroughly review the subject of sextant optics, and raised more questions
    in my mind.  We have not yet thoroughly described issues of depth of field,
    field of view, magnification, and glass and lens manufacture with respect to
    modern sextants.
    
    I have been prowling around the Internet looking for online information
    regarding sextant optics to fill in the gaps.  My guess is that these are
    closely guarded industrial secrets, or that there is information buried in
    specialized print publication that has not made its way to the Internet yet.
    And we do not have optics specialists on this list.  I am not in a
    geographic position that allows me to explore the print literature on this
    subject.
    
    Meanwhile I did turn up this distracting web page, where Celestaire appealed
    to the US Government to redefine sextant tariff law for the AstraIIIb:
    http://www.law.emory.edu/fedcircuit/july97/97-1005.html
    "Celestaire ... appeals the order of the United States Court of
    International Trade (defining) marine sextants as ?optical navigational
    instruments? ... dutiable at 5.6% ... rather than as ?other non-optical
    navigational instruments? ... which are not subject to a tariff."  It
    demonstrates how lawyers can argue the definition of a sextant, including
    whether they are metal instruments or not.  The central argument by
    Celestaire seemed to be that sextant optics do not primarily aid human
    vision, but are subsidiary to the purpose of measuring angles.  "It is
    uncontested that sextants are navigational instruments; we are only asked to
    determine whether they are optical ones or not."  The court concluded that
    "the immediate purpose of the sextant is to allow the user to see the sun
    and the horizon at the same time ? an act which the user could not otherwise
    do. The intermediate purpose is to accurately measure angles which can only
    be estimated by the naked eye. It is only the ultimate purpose, to determine
    navigational position, that does not have to do with enhancing human vision
    ...".  The Court  found in favouring of continuing the tariff, "Because a
    sextant aids or enhances human vision ... through the use of its
    non-subsidiary split-image mirror...".
    
    So the court reaffirms that split mirror optics indeed aid human vision, but
    ... precisely how?
    
    Jim Thompson
    jim2{at}jimthompson.net
    www.jimthompson.net
    Outgoing mail scanned by Norton Antivirus
    -----------------------------------------
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site