NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Sextant optics
From: Rodney Myrvaagnes
Date: 2004 May 4, 23:18 -0500
From: Rodney Myrvaagnes
Date: 2004 May 4, 23:18 -0500
On Tue, 4 May 2004 17:11:15 -0500, Ken Gebhart wrote: >on 5/4/04 8:45 AM, Jim Thompson at jim2@JIMTHOMPSON.NET wrote: > >> Ken, >> >> The minute I hit the send button on my original message I felt bad about >> including Celestaire's name instead of just making an anonymous quote to >> illustrate how lawyers might interpret sextant definitions. I was overtired >> after a night shift and got caught up in the moment without thinking clearly >> about how the message could be misinterpreted. My intention certainly was >> not to embarass Celestaire, if that is what happened. I apologize. It was >> silly of me. >> >> Meanwhile I continue to be very grateful to Celestaire for your wonderful >> service to me. Keep me as a customer? >> >> Jim Thompson >> jim2@jimthompson.net >> www.jimthompson.net >> Outgoing mail scanned by Norton Antivirus >> ----------------------------------------- >> >Jim, >No problem. I answered only because I thought the various (legal) ways a >sextant might be viewed may be of interest to the group. Those with some >extra time to spare might chime in how their respective countries classify >sextants. > And I for one am glad you did. I found it fascinating. Thanks you Rodney Myrvaagnes J36 Gjo/a Ask not where the buck stops. . . . .
