NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Sextant optics
From: Ken Gebhart
Date: 2004 May 4, 17:11 -0500
From: Ken Gebhart
Date: 2004 May 4, 17:11 -0500
on 5/4/04 8:45 AM, Jim Thompson at jim2@JIMTHOMPSON.NET wrote: > Ken, > > The minute I hit the send button on my original message I felt bad about > including Celestaire's name instead of just making an anonymous quote to > illustrate how lawyers might interpret sextant definitions. I was overtired > after a night shift and got caught up in the moment without thinking clearly > about how the message could be misinterpreted. My intention certainly was > not to embarass Celestaire, if that is what happened. I apologize. It was > silly of me. > > Meanwhile I continue to be very grateful to Celestaire for your wonderful > service to me. Keep me as a customer? > > Jim Thompson > jim2@jimthompson.net > www.jimthompson.net > Outgoing mail scanned by Norton Antivirus > ----------------------------------------- > Jim, No problem. I answered only because I thought the various (legal) ways a sextant might be viewed may be of interest to the group. Those with some extra time to spare might chime in how their respective countries classify sextants. Ken