Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Sextant index error measurement
    From: Paul Hirose
    Date: 2006 Nov 02, 15:42 -0800

    I'm just a bubble sextant owner, but based on what I've read it seems
    that the normal method for measuring a marine sextant's index error is
    to bring the direct and reflected images of an object (horizon etc.)
    into coincidence. There is also the method of splitting a celestial body
    and bringing opposite limbs into contact. Trying to think outside the
    box, I looked at another approach, utilizing the eye's ability to
    accurately bisect the gap between two closely spaced lines.
    The method I propose uses a test target of several parallel, equally
    spaced horizontal lines. The lines should appear closely spaced but
    clearly resolved at *double* the distance at which the target will be
    used. (The reason for that will become clear.) The white spaces between
    lines should be should be considerably wider than the lines, perhaps
    three times wider.
    Set up the target at a measured distance and sight it through the
    sextant. Bring the reflected and direct images into coincidence. Due to
    the parallax between the two lines of sight, the sextant will be set to
    a slight negative angle ("off the arc"). From the vertical distance
    between the telescope and index mirror, and the distance to the target,
    you can compute the parallax. Add parallax to the sextant reading to
    obtain index error.
    That's a preliminary value. The point of coincidence is hard to judge
    when attempting to put black lines on top of each other. It's easier to
    bisect a narrow white space with a black line. That's the reason for the
    multiple lines on the target. A slight movement of the micrometer knob
    will split the images so the black lines of one will bisect the spaces
    of the other, thus doubling the number of visible lines and halving
    their spacing.
    The additional small angle to attain this condition can be calculated
    from the line spacing and distance to the target. Additional bisections
    occur at multiples of that angle, allowing an average index error to be
    calculated using more than one point on the worm. (Doing a full
    revolution would require a large target, though: five feet at 100 yards.)
    Many variants of this method are possible. For example, the simplest
    test target would be a pair of lines plus a single line to bisect the
    space between them. If the pair and the single are spaced to match the
    vertical offset between the direct and reflected lines of sight at the
    sextant, parallax is eliminated.
    To check parallax, make another measurement at half the original
    distance. It would be best to construct another target so the sight
    picture looks the same at the shorter distance. The results from this
    second test will reveal any residual parallax, since IE is constant with
    distance while parallax varies in inverse proportion.
    Unfortunately I don't have a marine sextant to try any of this.
    I block messages that contain attachments or HTML.
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site