Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Sextant calibration.
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2007 Apr 22, 10:56 +0100

    Thanks to Frank for his further explanation of the Mendoza proposal for
    calibrating sextant angles, in such a way that even I can follow it (this
    time). Though I am still of the opinion that it would be a difficult matter
    to find a suitable location for putting it into practice.
    
    I wonder if, at last, we might have stumbled on the true purpose behind
    Stonehenge; as a National Calibration Facility for megalithic sextants...
    
    Frank referred to Mendoza's "Tables for Facilitating the Calculations of
    Nautical Astronomy" published in 1801. I have a copy of another Mendoza
    paper, from that same year, "On an improved Reflecting Circle", page 363 of
    Phil. Trans., read June 4 1801.
    
    In that paper, the English language is quite flawless, so Mendoza had picked
    it up well, or benefitted from a good editor. By that date, he was well into
    the scientific Establishment, having been elected FRS.
    
    Clive Sutherland has kindly provided me with a transcribed copy of that
    paper, with its beautiful engravings of his repeating circle. In my view,
    such engravings are art-objects in their own right, in addition to their
    techical content. I recommend that paper as well worth reading.
    
    I have long had an interest in repeating circles, which were intended to
    overcome the deficiencies in hand-division of arcs, by allowing the same arc
    to be remeasured again and again, and summed automatically, each time using
    a new segment of the scale, adjacent to the previous one. That allowed any
    irregularity in the division to be averaged out, though by Mendoza's date,
    engine-division had minimised those irregularities. Mendoza reviews the
    principle of Mayer's original invention, of Borda's adaptation, which
    doubled the rate at which angles were accumulated, and his own development,
    which doubled it again.
    
    One innovation was a new type of Vernier scale, for reading out the angle
    against a circular ring, which was divided all around in whole degrees, 0 to
    360. The Vernier, instead of being a short segment a few degrees wide, as
    normal, was instead another complete circle, placed within the main circle
    and in contact, uniformly divided in a rather similar way to the first one,
    but this time into 361 divisions rather than 360, and marked as 0 to 59
    minutes, split into sixths of a minute, with one extra sixth of a minute
    thrown in, where its head met its tail. I haven't seen an arrangement like
    that elsewhere.
    
    As I see it, that spread-out Vernier didn't offer any advantage in reading
    accuracy, over the ordinary short Vernier segment. You were still restricted
    to the precision with which you could estimate that two marks were aligned,
    or were not. Unlikely though it may seem, it was a labour-saving device, in
    the dividing of the main scale. For the same accuracy, if the Vernier had
    been restricted to a segment subtending only 10 "true" degrees, and
    therefore its sixth-minute markings being far closer together, the markings
    all around the main scale would also have to be correspondingly closer
    together. That would add enormously to the labour of dividing such a long
    arc, especially if hand-division was contemplated, and would have added to
    the clutter. Mendoza's alternative Vernier seems particularly clear and easy
    to read. The difficulty must have been in precisely dividing that Vernier
    ring into 361 parts rather than 360, and I wonder how that job was done.
    
    By the way, I refer above to "true" degrees, because Mendoza's circle was
    divided into 360 degrees, as was Borda's, and also Bird's brass version of
    Mayer's. Not like Mayer's original prototype, which went 0 to 720 around the
    circle; with two marked degrees for the price of one real one. That, just as
    in the conventional sextant, allowed for the doubling of the reflection
    angle as the index mirror tilted.
    
    Oh dear, I seem to have strayed way off the original topic. But Mendoza was
    certainly an interesting character.
    
    George.
    
    contact George Huxtable at george---.u-net.com
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ----- Original Message -----
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site