Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Sextant accuracy (was : Plumb-line horizon vs. geocentric horizon)
    From: Frank Reed CT
    Date: 2005 Feb 23, 17:13 EST
    Ken earlier wrote:
    "When the
    observer is allowed to pan back and forth (using the image slices as a
    video stream) then the apparent resolution of the images increases by
    about an order of magnitude."
    I wonder if this is the same phenomenon:
    When an image of the Sun is projected onto a smooth white screen, such as a sheet of paper, there is a certain amount of detail visible. But when the screen itself is slowly rotated or panned through the projected image, considerably more detail becomes apparent (the faculae, in particular, show up best when the screen is moved around). Presumably, the visual system is ignoring small random defects in the screen because they are now moving around. Or maybe the visual system tracks image components which move together as a unit... I'm sure this has been tested out. Any relevance to sextant use? A benefit for shaky hands again?? <g>
    42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site