
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Sextant accuracy (was : Plumb-line horizon vs. geocentric horizon)
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Feb 19, 19:15 EST
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 Feb 19, 19:15 EST
Alex E wrote:
"But my impression
is that the resolution of 1" does not contradict any laws of physics."
is that the resolution of 1" does not contradict any laws of physics."
For imaging resolution, it does.
"Besides, I am sure that all this was carefully studied by
researchers in human vision, and finding it out only
requires some search."
"Besides, I am sure that all this was carefully studied by
researchers in human vision, and finding it out only
requires some search."
Right. And apparently the standard *imaging* resolution of the human eye is
indeed diffraction limited at about 30 arcseconds under ideal conditions. The
array of cone cells in the fovea of the retina has approximately the same
angular resolution. Ideal conditions are not normal conditions, of course, and
under more typical conditions, the imaging resolution is closer to 60 arcseconds
(that's 20/20 vision). In extreme bright light, when the pupil is contracted,
the diffraction limit goes up and the resolution necessarily becomes worse, and
in extreme low light conditions, the pupil dilates exposing a larger portion of
the optically poor cornea and lense and the resolution worsens again. Indirect
sunlight apparently yields the optimal pupil diameter and thus optimal
resolution. (btw, it doesn't have anything to do with rods versus cones as long
as we're talking about looking directly at the target object --there aren't any
rods in the fovea).
Beyond imaging resolution, this "vernier acuity" or "hyperacuity" means
that the human vision system (which includes the eye and its components but also
a big slice of the brain) has some ability to go beyond normal
resolution by a factor of ten (or twenty!) in certain very specific tasks,
some of which are definitely applicable to sextant use. There appears to be no
consensus model that explains this extreme visual acuity except that it is
probably happening in the brain, but the ability is not unusual.
Almost everyone has hyperacuity except infants (they test them with teeny tiny
sextants), and it is not dependent on other visual defects. For example, it
turns out that people with moderately bad myopia can still pass 10
arcsecond vernier acuity tests. I'm going to try to put some sort of web-based
vision test so that we can experiment with this ourselves --just for the fun of
it.
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars