
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Sextant accuracy
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Feb 13, 17:54 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Feb 13, 17:54 -0500
On the recent topic of measuring star-to-star distances: The Russian book "Precision of astronomical determinations of ships position", says that precision of star-to-star distances strongly depends on the position of your sextant. (I discovered this myself, experimentally, and was complaining on the "inconvenient" position on this list last October:-) If the upper star is on the right of the lower star, the position is "good". In the opposite case it is "bad". They say that the results of "special investigations" show that the standard error in good position is 0.15' to 0.18' while in a bad position is is 0.3' to 0.4'. BTW, they recommend at least 7 measurements of a distance with star-to-star observations. Hadley was obviously left-handed. Left handed people make a minority (though I am not sure about England:-) It is amazing that they imposed the sextant design convenient for them on ALL people:-) (I read of the unique right-handed sextant in the Bauer book, but I've never heard of a sextant with TWO handles, which would be the most natural choice. Many reflecting circles have two handles, on both sides). A