Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Sextant Positions versus Map Datums?
    From: Michael Wescott
    Date: 2002 Jan 15, 12:41 PM

    jared.sherman{at}VERIZON.NET said:
    > Okay, a sextant position is based on the almanac which is based
    > on...ergh...How exactly does that match up to a map datum? Should a
    > sextant position line up with a WGS84 chart position? An NAD27? A
    > what-ever-is-most recent datum? Or can it be expected to be off
    > by...What distance actually?
    
    The almanac is based on astronomical observations that are independent
    of any specific model of the earth as well as independent of the locale
    in which the measurements are made.
    
    WGS84 et al. are mathematical constructs, i.e. " sea-level surfaces"
    that are designed to closely fit local observations. The details are
    in what is meant by "local" and by "closely fit". For example a
    reference ellipsoid might ignore the fit of altitude and try to
    make latitude and longitude fit more closely to actual observations.
    North American ellipsoids will model the sea-level surface of North
    America at the expense of big errors in say Austrailia.
    
    For a more detailed and more lucid explanation see Chapter 2 of
    Bowditch: http://pollux.nss.nima.mil/NAV_PUBS/APN/Chapt-02.pdf
    
    > If NAD27 and WGS84 disagree by a mile, then wouldn't the "most
    > accurate" sextant position still either be off by a mile, or have been
    > off by a mile? Or maybe still be off wherever the map datum doesn't
    > match a "spherical earth" model?
    
    > How exactly does one accomodate the "no datum here" from a sextant
    > position? Aside from the fact that the difference may be meaningless
    > out at sea, where the maps all agree that "you are here" in the big
    > empty spaces and a mile or two doesn't always matter.
    
    The better fit should be the more "local" model. That said, I would
    think that the uncertainty of sextant observations would be the same
    order on magnitude or larger than the differences between any two
    reasonable models. Looking at chart 25641 (it's on my wall here at
    work) shows that it's based on NAD83, "which for charting purposes
    is considered identical to WGS84." The note goes on to discuss the
    difference between charted positions and those referenced to the
    Puerto Rico Datum as about 7" north-south and 1.5" east-west. Seven
    seconds of latitude is about 12 feet.
    
    
    --
            Mike Wescott
            Wescott_Mike{at}EMC.COM
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site