NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Science
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Aug 29, 19:16 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Aug 29, 19:16 -0500
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Mike Hannibal wrote: > They tell us A truth, a truth based on the use of a > certain set of rules generated from a belief system. I > am not arguing against that set of rules nor aginst > that belief system. I am just saying that "it ain't > the only one". Yes, of course. The beliefs of "Scientologists" or astrologers, or all sorts of Fundamentalists (or Communists) are other systems. I was only saying that this one (science) is not LIKE any one, because it is the ONLY one which gives us reliable TRUTH. > Certainly a system of beliefs but the knowledge is > only certain with respect to the system of belief and > the generated set of rules. With this I strongly disagree. The scientific knowledge is certain for very different reasons. Because it is TESTED by experience. Look, everyone, even Muslim Fundamentalists use cell phones, cars, automatic weapons, explosives and Internet. (The things unimaginable without scinece). And their system of beliefs is very different from ours. Name me a person of ANY system of beliefs who never used electricity. Alex.