NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Rules of the Road While Backing
From: Brent Ferrantelli
Date: 1999 Feb 07, 15:33 EST
From: Brent Ferrantelli
Date: 1999 Feb 07, 15:33 EST
hello, any thoughts on ships with z-drives or multiple thrusters that can move in a straight line in any direction? Is this a case where the "bow" could be any point on the ships hull? Also, someone mentioned rule 34 concerning sound signals when operation astern propulsion. . .how does this rule apply to z-drives etc.? QM2 Brent Ferrantelli. USCG ---------- >From: captainmike7@XXX.XXX >To: <navigation@XXX.XXX> >Subject: Re: [Nml] Rules of the Road While Backing >Date: Sat, Feb 1999, 2:58 AM > > At 20:34 2/5/99 -0800, Dennis W. Farrell wrote in part: > >>It is the practice of seamen to consider in such cases that the rules > apply with >reference to the direction of motion of the ship so that for > the time being, the >starboard side becomes the port side and the port side > the starboard side. >>In other words, we must consider the pilot of a backing vessel to be > facing aft >toward the direction in which his ship is moving. He must then > keep clear of a >vessel on his right hand as if that were his starboard > side. And his whistle signals >must correspond. > ______________________________________________________________ > > What, then, is the significance of Rule 34, which requires power-driven > vessels when meeting or crossing to sound three short blasts to mean "I am > operating astern propulsion"? Surely not just to advise vessels off her > bows that she is backing AWAY from them? > > This "direction-of-travel" interpretation is at odds with Rule 13(a): > "NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING contained in the rules of Part B, Sections I and > II, any vessel overtaking any other shall keep out of the way of the vessel > being overtaken" and 13(b) "A vessel shall be deemed to be overtaking when > coming up with another vessel from a direction more than 22.5 degrees abaft > her beam (i.e. 67.5 degrees either side of dead astern)...that is, in such > a position with reference to the vessel she is overtaking, that at night > she would be able to see only the sternlight of that vessel but neither of > her sidelights." Note that there is no reference to direction of travel in > the "Overtaking" rule. Under the "direction of travel" interpretation, > must the vessel backing at night also relocate her sidelights and > sternlight? How else would other vessels know to treat her stern as her > bow? Relative motion can be difficult to interpret in the dark. > > I don't even want to BEGIN thinking about the situation where BOTH vessels > are backing toward one another at night, each at 65 degrees to the other's > stern. Who's overtaking whom? > > (It is worth noting that vessels making a habit of not turning around when > going back where they came from - primarily double-ended ferries - > generally have machinery and propellers at each end, so they do not operate > "astern propulsion". They also reverse their navigation lights to > accommodate direction of travel). > > P/Lt/C Michael A. LeButt, FC > Balboa (Newport Beach, CA) Squadron > > "A ship in harbor is safe, > but that's not what ships are for..." > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-= > =-= TO UNSUBSCRIBE, send this message to majordomo@XXX.XXX: =-= > =-= navigation =-= > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-= > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-= =-= TO UNSUBSCRIBE, send this message to majordomo@XXX.XXX: =-= =-= navigation =-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=