NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Rude Starfinder History
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2014 Jul 17, 12:28 -0700
From: Greg Rudzinski <NoReply_Rudzinski@fer3.com>
To: garylapook@pacbell.net
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 3:51 PM
Subject: [NavList] Re: Rude Starfinder History
Attached File:
(2102.jpg: Open and save)
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2014 Jul 17, 12:28 -0700
Well, not so fast. It is referred to in paragraph 2102 of the twelvth edition of Dutton's but is also shown in paragraph 1811 of the seventh, much earlier (1942), edition. This refers to H.O. 2102-C and the much larger 2102-A. It has since been moved and is in paragraph 2002 of the fourteenth edition.
gl
From: Greg Rudzinski <NoReply_Rudzinski@fer3.com>
To: garylapook@pacbell.net
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 3:51 PM
Subject: [NavList] Re: Rude Starfinder History
Fred,
The only strange number association that I could find regarding the 2102 star finder is that it is first refered to in Duttons in the second paragraph of
chapter 21. See attached page. Quite a coincidence.
Greg Rudzinski
Re: Rude Starfinder History
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2014 Jul 17, 08:32 -0400
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2014 Jul 17, 08:32 -0400
Bill, I was aware it was a publication number. But I've read posts on this list intimate that the choice of digits had some meaning. Fred Fred Hebard mbiew---.net
Attached File:
(2102.jpg: Open and save)
