NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Request for help re sunset predictions.
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2005 Apr 8, 00:08 +0100
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2005 Apr 8, 00:08 +0100
Thanks to Henry Halboth and Bruce Stark for helpful responses to my question about the existence of precise tables for predicting the moment of sunset. Scoresby would do his whaling in latitudes that would sometimes take him as far North as 80deg, in seasons when the ice allowed it. But in each of the sunset observations I'm investigating, Scoresby was on his way North, in latitudes 62 to 65 North (near Shetland), up to 72 deg, but not yet in Arctic circle midnight-sun waters. Of course, once he is seeing a midnight Sun, there are no sunsets to observe. And at dates close to that situation, when the Sun is setting, but not going far below the horizon, the Sun-setting will be a slow and long-drawn-out process, not leading to any accurate timing. Henry asked- "do you suppose he could have been making some use of Norie's Table XLV - "For finding the time most advantageous for observing the altitude of a celestial object, in order to obtain the apparent time" - by considering sunset as the Sun's closest approach to the Prime Vertical and working backwards by interpolation to arrive at a time." I doubt that; the dates of the sunset observations I'm trying to sort out are late March / early April, and in Northern latitudes, after the spring equinox, the Sun has already passed through the Prime Vertical as it sets. Also, looking at Table XLV, it doesn't distinguish between the Sun and other celestial objects, so appears to make no allowance for semidiameter. In which case, I presume, it's not intended to give results to any great accuracy. In that respect, another possibility might be that if sunset happened to be defined, for this purpose, as the Sun being bisected by the horizon, then there would no longer be any need to allow for Sun's semidiameter. Is that a possibility? I thank Henry for such imaginative thinking, and beg him not to stop, if he gets other such ideas. As for Bruce's suggestion of Wakeley's "Mariner's Compass Rectified", I'll search that out on my next library visit. George. ================================================================ contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at 01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. ================================================================