NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Reply to George Huxtable and other interested folks
From: Mike Burkes
Date: 2003 Jul 25, 18:21 -0700
From: Mike Burkes
Date: 2003 Jul 25, 18:21 -0700
Sorry for the non conforming data presentation vs formal sight reduction forms! I am fairly new at this computer stuff. Any questions my phone no:626-833-1521 anytime and email:m_burkes@msn.com. Mike Burkes >From: MIKE BURKES>Reply-To: Navigation Mailing List >To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM >Subject: Reply to George Huxtable >Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:57:02 -0700 > >Hi folks and particularly to George who is anything but " particularly slow >and/or stupid!!" I will answer his questions the best I can. A "pinwheel >fix" refers to the ideal situation of the LOPS intersecting at one point >taking the name from the toy i.e. a plastic star -shaped wheel pinned to >rotate at end of stick by wind power. My "fix":34 24.8N, 119 01.5W vs >www.Geocode.com:34 28' 25.36"N,118 40' 05.23"w. Bodies were Sun,Moon,Vega. >Data: All dates and times G reenwhich,IC =0,Dip not applicable because of >artificial horizon, HO 249 for sight reduction. Sun LL:2Hs=97d 48.3m, July >04,2003, GMT 17-00-09, assumed L=34dN,aLong=118d 56.7W. Moon LL no.1: >2Hs=59d 48.9, July 05, GMT 04-23-10, aL=34dN,aLong=118d 38.1W. Moon LL >no.2: >2Hs=92 d49.8m, July 07, GMT 03-27-54 aL=34dN.aLong=119d 21.3W. Vega: 2Hs: >103d 40.1m,July 07, GMT 04-23-04,aL=34dN,aLong=119d00.0W. My resulting >fix:34d 24.8N, 119d 01.5W. Sun is Lunar Dist. body. Data: Four obs: GMT >20-53-15, 20-58-35, 21-02-40, 21-03-30, corresponding Ds: 61d 32.2m, 61 >34.3, 61 36.0, 61 36.3. AP for Hc"s: 34d 24.0N, 119d 02.0W. Sun Hc=74d >36.5m,Moon Hc= 37d 30..5m. C.E.Fast 12m 25s,July 04, cleared dist"D" as per >Stark book=61d 23.0m resulting in GMT error of 00m 07s. >Reason for cocktail? Insufficient quanty of baby oil i.e. bath oil used to >make up difference in tray! Reflections at certain points of tray were >distorted. > >>From: George Huxtable >>Reply-To: Navigation Mailing List >>To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM >>Subject: Trying to understand- was "urgent help needed" >>Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:21:18 +0100 >> >>Under the thread name "urgent help needed", (which seemed inappropriate, >>so >>I've changed it). Mike Burkes said- >> >> >Hi folks! An interesting observational situation occurred as follows: >>Using >> >Davis Artificial Horizon sites appeared ok i.e. graphing 2Hs vs. time on >>all >> >sites resulted in a near classic "pinwheel fix".However comparing "fix" >>to >> >map the results were off. Using my"fix" for Hc computations lunar >>distance >> >GMT differed by a mere few seconds indicating the flexibility of assumed >> >position choice. I feel the reason for the discrepancy stems from the >> >artificial horizon fluid being a combination of baby and bath oil >> >introducing a constant error.I did notice several aberrations while >>scanning >> >the pool. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Mike Burkes >> >> >>I may be particularly slow, or stupid, but I understood very little about >>Mike's observations. What's a "pinwheel fix"? When he says comparing "fix" >>to map the results were off; how much off? >> >>He hasn't given us a single number to go on. What bodies was he observing >>sights of? From where? When? What were the resulting altitudes? What was >>the calculated position? What body was used with the Moon for lunar >>distance? What was the resulting distance? >> >>Only if we get some details to get our teeth into can we hope to respond >>to >>Mike's request for feedback. That's as I see it, anyway: it may be clearer >>to others, with sharper minds. >> >>I've never had much use for bath oil (or baby oil either, happy to >>say...). >>Do they mix? What was the intention behind this cocktail? If an oily >>substance is being chosen for an artificial horizon, it seems sensible to >>choose something really viscous or treacly, because wind won't ruffle its >>surface noticeably. Does Mike's blend of oils meet that requirement? >> >>George Huxtable. >> >>================================================================ >>contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at >>01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy >>Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. >>================================================================ > >_________________________________________________________________ >Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail