NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Refraction, sunset, and HO229 beginner question
From: Jim Theriot
Date: 2004 Jul 22, 09:46 -0500
From: Jim Theriot
Date: 2004 Jul 22, 09:46 -0500
Bill said: > The idea struck me that at sunrise and sunset I could get a LOP without a > sextant. One barrel of my binoculars, a heavy-duty neutral-density filter, > a watch, Nautical Almanac and HO229 tables would suffice. I was struck by a possibly similar idea -- I am not sure if it's the same idea, because Bill's comments are mostly about use of almanac and tables, not about the basic principle. My idea was simply that for any observation you make with watch and sextant where the object appears on the horizon, the same observation could be made with watch only (or watch and binoculars). Then you run the computations, using using zero for the sextant reading, making all the appropriate corrections (but using zero for the sextant index error correction!), and you should get identical results. Possibly that's what Bill was getting at. Furthermore, it seems that on a moonless night you might be able to get a LOP from the setting of a star or planet more easily using this method, since you don't have to see the horizon, you only need to note the instant at which the star or planet blinks out. I wanted to test this theory on a sailing trip a couple of months ago (I live inland, not in sight of a 'real' horizon), but weather and circumstances prevented it. Regards, Jim