Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Refraction near the Horizon – Ob servation vs. Calculation
    From: Marcel Tschudin
    Date: 2013 Apr 5, 17:59 +0300
    Brad,

    Yes, knowing the HoE more accurate would indeed be an advantage. I do however not kmow how I could improve the estimate for locations as shown in the attached photo where I was sitting on top of the concrete border. (This photo was not used for measurements.) At these locations I tried to estimate the height from persons standing below near the water imagining then how many times I would have to pile them to reach my HoE.

    Do you, Sems, have an idea how one could arrive at a better estimation of HoE at Sahil? With a GPS I would measure first the height at eye level and then at water level. I think I have to find out where to obtain a "good" GPS and then come over to perform the measurements at the various locations.

    Marcel


    On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Brad Morris <bradley.r.morris---.com> wrote:

    Hi Bruce

    The equation models the effect of refraction by the air on a sphere the size of the earth.  It uses standard pressure and temperature.  If your pressure and/or temperature are non-standard, then the equation is not a good match.  More advanced equations exist which include these parameters.

    As to GPS units and vertical height.  If the unit can average a position over time, then the height of the water and the height of the eye can be measured and the delta found.  My Garmin averages at a 1 hertz rate.  In order to get a reasonably error free value, I need about 1000 points.  Alex noticed that the HoE was not good for short term or instantaneous  reports.  For large HoE, this won't matter, but for small HoE, its highly significant.  Marcel's data, wherein the HoE is estimated ---  Bill's results,  if you recall, matched the standard equation when he measured the HoE, but meandered off when his HoE was from a mapped resource. 

    Let me emphasize this.  The Height of Eye value is critically important for low HoE.  The dip varies significantly for minor variation in height of eye when height of eye is low.

    Brad

    On Apr 5, 2013 9:15 AM, "Bruce J. Pennino" <bpennino.ce---net> wrote:

    Thank you for posting this information. The text is just excellent and well written. My math/statistics  background limits me , but I'll study the results.
     
    I was interested to see that you use the equation for dip 1.76 sq rt H meters, which is the same as 0.971 sq rt H feet.  I gather that this is the universally accepted equation, which I've proven to myself is from basic trig knowing the average radius of the earth? Right?

    Bruce
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 6:28 PM
    Subject: [NavList] Refraction near the Horizon – Observation vs. Calculation


    The following link leads to a first, gross description of the collected measurements, their related data and to two examples showing how the dataset can be used. ( I hope my version of English is sufficently comprehensible.)

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iTclXHZVFhHY9OtwX2V6unisf2lQbTA_gd54EyQWuq8/edit?usp=sharing

    The intention is now trying to find estimates for refraction and dip which agree even better with the measurements than those shown.

    Comments, suggestions and critics are welcome.

    Marcel

    P.S: May be one understands now why I encourage members of NavList to compile a similar dataset with measured dips.

    View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=123335

    View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=123350

    View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=123351


    File:


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site