NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Refraction near the Horizon ? Observation vs. Calculation
From: Hewitt Schlereth
Date: 2013 Apr 8, 13:23 -0700
From: Hewitt Schlereth
Date: 2013 Apr 8, 13:23 -0700
Yes, Marcel, they are on page 280 of the 2013 edition. Hewitt Sent from my iPad On Apr 8, 2013, at 1:10 PM, "Paul Hirose"wrote: > Marcel Tschudin wrote: >> The refraction formula is indeed the one from Bennett in a form which >> provides the resutls in degrees. Bennett provided also a second >> formula for further improving the result of this first formula. Does >> your N.A. 1998 edition makes reference to it? > > There's no reference to a more accurate formula. > > The formula (including the corrections for pressure and temperature) > duplicates the almanac's high and low altitude refraction > tables within 0.1′ for the values I tried, assuming 10 C and 1010 mb. I > didn't test the almanac table A4 corrections for nonstandard conditions. > >> Just in case these finding should one day be documented in a paper: >> How is the correct reference to this N.A. edition? > > 1998 Nautical Almanac Commercial Edition, published jointly by Paradise > Cay Publication and Celestaire Inc., "Sight Reduction Procedures" > chapter, p. 280. > > Does anyone have a newer almanac? Are the refraction and dip formulae > still included? > > -- > > > : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=123455 > >