NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Refraction and humidity
From: Marcel Tschudin
Date: 2007 Mar 28, 18:23 +0300
From: Marcel Tschudin
Date: 2007 Mar 28, 18:23 +0300
On 3/28/07, Alexandre E Eremenkowrote: > ... > I have is the chapter of Chauvenet where he explains > the work of Bessel, and attaches tables computed by Bessel's > formula with refraction in fractions of a SECOND. Alex, I would be cautious with such an information. It's certainly true right overhead in zenith direction where there is no refraction. Things become more difficult when approaching the horizon. It still might be true under "normal" observer conditions down to somewhere around 70 deg ZD. I think that what Frank explained is about appropriate for navigational purposes under "normal" observation conditions. Under "normal" conditions I mean an observer somewhere at mid-latitudes, under average (stable) weather conditions and possibly also not too high up in the sky. Bill, yes, all the parameters you mentioned are of concern when calculating refraction at high zenith distances; even the linear relationship of refraction from pressure and temperature fails there, they become highly exponential. Andy Young's Observatory paper, which Richard mentioned is highly recommendable. For those who don't have access to it, they can find a lot of its content in Andy's labyrinth of over hundred Web-pages on this subject. There are two entries into the labyrinth - The Tables of Contents: http://mintaka.sdsu.edu/GF/bibliog/toc.html - The Alphabetical Index: http://mintaka.sdsu.edu/GF/bibliog/alphindex.html Marcel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---