Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Refraction at the horizon. was: Re: Celestial Navigation without a sextant.
    From: Marcel Tschudin
    Date: 2008 Mar 14, 23:47 +0200

    I missed to reply on one important item:
    George wrote:
    >  refraction depends on temperature gradients at FAR greater heights.[than the observer near sea level]
    The word far (even written in upper case) may lead here to a
    misunderstanding. The air layers near the observer (below his eyes and
    above them) contribute most to the total refraction. Air layers high
    above him contribute only an epsilon to the total. In case of
    inversions, only those in layers close to the observer may cause
    ducting (infinite refraction); an inversion at a layer having a great
    distance (in height) to the observer can't produce ducting because the
    angle of incidence is too large.
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site